"Thank you very much for the discussion we had yesterday. Alex was very clear and helpful. He made sense of bits of information we already had and brought a lot of new information we didn't know about it. We do appreciate his knowledge and effort to help us a lot​. A big thank you to you, too, because you made this discussion happen...and for all the support we may need in the future!"

– Nina Ostend, client

"Let me thank you for the time you and Alex spent with us the other evening. We were impressed with your knowledge, professionalism, caring, and obvious passion for what you do."

– Marge and Gary Hildebrand, client

"I was impressed with the research and knowledge Alex has. He’s explained everything along the way; I’ve come to trust him implicitly. He always gives me hope, which is a huge benefit."

– Damian Latch, client and colon cancer survivor

---

Are Ultrasounds Accurate for Diagnosing Cancer?

While ultrasounds are typically still the first step in the standard cancer diagnosis process, they are far less detailed and informative than other imaging tools. Ultrasounds use sound waves to create images of the inside of the body: a transducer (probe) transmits high-frequency sound waves into the body and captures the sound waves that bounce back to produce the image.

Generally speaking, ultrasounds are unable to provide sufficient detail about tumours in the body – especially compared to PET/CT scans. This lack of key data can lead to misdiagnosis, as well as inaccurate treatment plans.

"I used to be afraid of getting cancer, but reading about all the resources you can now use against it makes me feel much better. Keep up the good work!"

– Gladys Neudorf

"My father is doing very well. He just had his appointment with his oncologist who gave him a glowing report. Best possible outcome. I am sure that the immunotherapy was instrumental in his cancer being undetectable a year after diagnosis…especially without surgery. We are confident that this good report will continue into the future. We are very grateful for your help and do believe more people should have access to this treatment [Keytruda]. We hope this will make the treatment more accessible, too. Once again, thank you so much."

– Karen Miller (daughter of Julio, carcinoma survivor, now cancer free)

Biochemist, Health Educator, and Author Stephen Cherniske of ‘The Healthy Skeptics’ recommends CTOAM - 5 stars

Problems with Ultrasounds

• Ultrasounds Often Fail to Detect Cancer
  Ultrasounds cannot differentiate cancerous tissue from non-cancerous tissue:
  • Therefore, an ultrasound can’t tell a cancerous tumour from a benign tumour
  • "Sometimes imaging tests can show something that looks like cancer, but further tests (such as a biopsy) show that it’s not cancer."
  • An ultrasound cannot show whether a change is caused by cancer
  • Ultrasounds are also ineffective in monitoring whether a treatment is working
  • They do not clearly identify the location of all tumours in your body

• Ultrasounds Have Limited Use
  Ultrasounds have limited use in some parts of the body because sound waves cannot travel through air or bone:
  • Therefore, ultrasounds cannot detect tumours in the lungs or bone.
  • Ultrasound images are not as detailed as images from CT scans or MRIs

• Ultrasounds Have Issues with Quality Control
  The quality of ultrasound images largely depends on the skill of the professional operating the transducer (aka the wand that sends the sound waves):
  • Therefore, the accuracy of your diagnosis will depend on the competency of the medical professional operating the transducer
  • This is not the case for CT and MRI scans
  • PET/CT scans are the most reliable, when it comes to producing images that speak entirely for themselves

• Ultrasounds Lack Sufficient Detail
  An ultrasound can miss small tumours:
  • "It takes millions of cells to make a tumor big enough to show up on an imaging test."
  • So even if cancer cells can’t be seen on an ultrasound, your doctor might have you continue cancer treatment to make sure that they don’t miss any lingering cancer cells that may be hanging around
  • Do not identify the most aggressive tumours - Therefore, doctors are unable to prioritize treatment effectively

• Ultrasounds are Problematic for Obese Patients
  Because of their low-energy sound waves, ultrasounds struggle to reach through thick layers of tissue.
  • Therefore, it is very difficult to get a good quality image in people who are obese
  • More than one third of Americans and over 20% of Canadians are considered obese

Best Diagnostic Imaging Test for Cancer

So with all of these problems, why are ultrasounds still being used as the primary diagnostic tool for cancer? Because:

• Ultrasounds are much cheaper than other forms of imaging
• They’re fast and simple to do
• They're generally able to differentiate between solid tumours and fluid-filled cysts (though, again, they cannot tell if the tumour is cancerous)
• They don’t expose people to radiation (like CT scans do)

Ultrasounds are currently used in standard cancer treatment as the primary diagnostic tool because they’re cost effective and quick to arrange.

However, there is a much more powerful imaging tool for cancer diagnosis: the PET/CT scan, which stands for Positron Emission Tomography – Computed Tomography. A PET/CT scan can pinpoint exactly where the cancer is in your body, how aggressive it is, as well as observe the outcome of cancer treatment – making it an essential diagnostic tool in fact-based cancer treatment. Please read more about the benefits of PET/CT scans to ensure that you can make an informed decision about what diagnostic tools to use.

If you or a loved one thinks there’s a chance you might have cancer – or have received a diagnosis of cancer – please connect with us today to learn how to make the most informed decision about your cancer treatment.

Register for a Precision Second Opinion to discover how we can help you to reduce stress and dramatically increase treatment success.